2.4 Titanic’s final moments w/ Violet Jessup
Now we go back to the actual sinking of the Titanic during
its final moments. A number of survivors
recalled hearing a tremendous roar go up as the ship went under (including
Violet). Some have explained the “roar”
having been caused by equipment (i.e. boilers) breaking loose and cascading
down a vertical or nearly vertical hull destroying bulkheads in the
process. This will be discussed
later. One survivor sketched a view
showing both the bow and stern pointing upward with the majority of the hull
under water. Other survivors remembered
the stern portion first sinking then falling back to the surface giving them
some hope for refuge, only to see it seemly pulled down almost vertically as
depicted in the movie “Titanic” These
witness accounts will be addressed later.
Here is what Violet remembered as she wrote her memoir years later. The following is her account of the initial
impact:
”Crash!....Then
a low, rending, crunching, ripping sound, as Titanic shivered a trifle and the
sound of her engines gently ceased”; (page 125 of John’s book).
The accounts of what happened during and after the
crash by other survivors differ in detail from Violet’s recollection she had
years later.
Next
we have her remembrances aboard lifeboat #16:
“……
I sat paralyzed with cold and misery, as I watched Titanic give a lurch
forward. One of the huge funnels toppled
off like a cardboard model, falling into the water with a fearful roar. A few cries came to us across the water, then
silence, as the ship seemed to right itself like a hurt animal with a broken
back. She settled for a few moments, but
one more deck of lighted ports [portholes] disappeared. Then she went down by the head with a
thundering roar of underwater explosions, our proud ship, our beautiful Titanic
gone to her doom.” (page 133 in John’s book).
Author
Maxtone-Graham inserts an additional detail on page 140 of his book—(ref. 1):
but first some remembrances by Violet that triggers his detail.
“It is only when something is over, when your mind is
detached from immediate surroundings, that you visualize actual details. One of
these surviving officers had gone down with the ship and then been blown up
with the explosion; he somehow managed to get clear and was picked up by one of
the boats. “
Maxtonel-Graham then inserts the following comment:
“This was, of course, Second
Officer Herbert "Lights" Lightoller who, struggling in the water near
the sinking ship, had been drawn down and affixed atop an engine room grating
as sea water flooded into it. But that same flow of water proved the instrument
of his salvation. It apparently struck a still-hot boiler, fracturing it. The
ensuing explosion miraculously blew Lightoller clear of the wreck and he managed to clamber aboard an
overturned Englehardt collapsible lifeboat that had been launched inverted when
Titanic went down. His subsequent leadership throughout the night on that
overturned boat with thirty precarious survivors standing atop it remains one of the most heroic
sagas of the wreck.”
There you have it—a seasoned veteran of the seas using the
words explosion(s) and an authoritarian naval historian backing her up with the
same words. These passages triggered my
return to writing of this disaster and subsequent re-analysis based on the explosion
premise. It is ironic that it was
Lightoller’s testimony during the hearings that the Titanic sank intact, and
this is what I think led to the dismissal of boiler explosions being involved
in the sinking. I find it remarkable,
perhaps even incredible, that the other technological experts, and there are
many involved, refrain, for reasons best known to them, from even considering
boiler explosions in their forensic analysis of the Titanic disaster.
This is very intresting..
ReplyDelete